masquerade



The lost man
For the self and the masquerade project I’m dealing mainly with topic masculinity in the 21st century. It seems like there is not enough photographic work in this field, almost as if it has been neglected in the past.
The emancipation of the women and the whole feminist movement drew a lot of attention on femininity and this might be some of the factors for ‘the lost man’. Man and his masculinity have been constantly redefined through the values of equality. Furthermore man has also been condition by many new circumstances of modern life. The man has transformed from being the performer of feminist research into the subject of science in masculinity. Already at this point the crucial question rises: what actually makes a man a man, nowadays?
Instead of working with different stereotype appearances I depicted particular sections that cross over on many different types. Searching for a coherent root or universal ideals, it seemed logical to research on single and predominant characteristics of man. As an alternative to the standard representation of man, I like to open this topic in my work and question the principles of masculinity with myself as subject and object.
‘A whole foot’
The penis is supposedly the most obvious part of defining male gender, but surely it doesn’t make a man yet. The man’s ‘best piece’ was celebrated in many cultures as a symbol of fertility and growth. Like in ancient Indian, Greek or Egyptian mythology the phallus was a meaningful symbol. In the western culture though it is still a taboo on any decent public media.
Worries of man that their penis is not big enough doesn’t only lead back to the idea of fully satisfying a woman, but also to satisfy themselves in comparison with other men. Either way it concludes: Size does matter! If things can be too small, then they can be too big, too.
Healthy penis attitude of man could signalize vigour identification of masculinity.
A man, who is proud to be a man, is a man’s man.
‘Let me entertain you’
Robbie Williams became a much more successful pop star when he left Take That. With songs like “Better man” and “Let me entertain you” he conquered in his solo career the hearts of many women, but behind this successful showman and pioneer of masculinity lies also a broken and drug conflicted second self. It is a familiar phenomenon of rock and pop stars to loose touch with them selves and drown under the pressure of the demanding performance and masquerade on stage.
After Judith Butler’s gender studies we all just perform our gender and it can be argued the whole world is a stage in where we play our roles. This theory could suggest though that we are not who we really are. I can see that we are who we want to be; we are the masquerade we play just as much as the puppeteer or actor behind it, because one cannot exist without the other.
An actor is hypothetically versatile in his character and could please almost anyone; probably this someone is everybody’s man.
‘Put yourself in someone else’s shoes’
In the past fashion determined the gender or the other way around. Women wore skirts and man wore trousers. Modern life changed these standards and the line between male and female fashion has once more blurred. That women wear trousers nowadays is absolutely normal, but David Beckham’s nail varnish took it another step further. Beckham’s classification with the term metrosexual was announced 2002 by British journalist Mark Simpson in his the article “Meet the metrosexual”.
The definition of metrosexual sums up to a heterosexual man who looks gay. Man can now use fashion statements that have been understood as feminine, without being considered queer. How would it look if Mr. Beckham steps into some high heels I tried balancing on.
It could conclude that a man in touch with his feminine side is a lady’s man.
Bibliography
BBC report on Robbie Williams
http://www.bbc.co.uk/stoke/robbie/biography.shtml
Wikipidia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Butler
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculinity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrosexual
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phallus
David Gauntett, summery of Butler’s’Gender Trouble’.
http://www.theory.org.uk/ctr-butl.htm
Dr. Mary Klages, summery of Butler’s’Gender Trouble’.
http://www.colorado.edu/English/courses/ENGL2012Klages/butler.html
Mark Simpson, ‘Meet the metrosexual’
http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2002/07/22/metrosexual/index.html
March 4, 2009 at 2:36 pm
Hay, thanks for your time with the subject of lost masculinity. What is interesting to me is the open acceptance of human sexuality and virility between those of warmer and cooler climates, say Brazil vs. Alaska for example. Very different, flip the channel to Mexico broadcasts and you see a very type cast women however, its all breasts, hair, make-up, hips and motion. Where USA is the 1920-30’s Coke girl(s).
Chemicals from certain plastics mimic hormones feminizes men and elevates the testosterone effects of women. This is fact. Hormone receptors adapt synthetic hormone like chemicals creating conception difficulties for women, attitudes, behaviors are all effected by chemicals good or bad.
Emotionally when a natural aspect of sexuality or personality is repressed by a Corporate controlled media (rather than a free society – really) it comes out ‘distorted’. Men in Europe (Spain) don’t seem to be hung up on Christian mores, they go for what they want… and are much more open to what happens on the street. They smell the women, they love a full sensory experience.
Women are not supposed to be so clean shaven – anyway interesting subject.
Great works sited too! Thanks for your interest…
I really believe we as spirit beings are neither male or female anyway.
Our bodies since conception identify with so deeply as ‘us’ that we have a difficult time seeing outside and into the 3rd eye shockra where spirit is spirit nothing else… sex is a physical equivalent to ‘union’ and ‘absolute-joy’ which in true sexual intercourse IS this for the duration of this higher state of consciousness where the two literally become ONE. It all boils down to Agape love. Everything else is EGO.
I can recommend one book that really explains face to face what women/men are grappling with in this day.
“Divine Duality, William Keepin, Ph. D”
http://www.divineduality.org/
He gives a wonderful account of our struggles that you may suit the purpose of your research and the hands on ground work that is going on right now to bring the unification of the sexes together for all levels of healing which explores many things taboo to the western mind (conditioned ego/self) that may be worth further exploration or inspiration for your work. Very glad I discovered your site.
Its very modern and follows the path of questions we all are having about our national character, personal identities and intimate frustrations. Take care!